top of page

FOLLOW US

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Threads
  • LinkedIn
  • Writer: Julie Barris | Crisis Counselor | Therapist-in-Training
    Julie Barris | Crisis Counselor | Therapist-in-Training
  • Jul 27

What a romantic comedy reveals about emotional avoidance, perfectionism, and the quiet courage it takes to truly feel.

Leap Year: Are You Chasing Control or Choosing Connection?

In the 2010 film Leap Year, Anna Brady (played by Amy Adams) is a woman with a clear path and a carefully designed life. She’s polished, organized, and driven — the kind of person who thrives on color-coded calendars and 5-year plans. When her long-time boyfriend still hasn’t proposed, Anna decides to take matters into her own hands. Following an old Irish tradition, she plans to propose to him on February 29th, leap day, during a business trip to Ireland.


It’s the perfect plan: romantic, symbolic, and, above all, strategic.


But as life (and every good rom-com) would have it, the trip goes sideways. Flights are cancelled, travel is rerouted, and she’s forced to enlist the help of Declan, a gruff yet emotionally intuitive Irish innkeeper, to drive her across the country.


What starts as a comedic series of mishaps quickly becomes a deeper journey — one that strips away Anna’s carefully crafted control and reveals just how emotionally detached she’s become.



What Lies Beneath the Plot: Control as a Coping Mechanism


On its surface, Leap Year is lighthearted and picturesque, but the psychology behind Anna’s behavior is layered. What she calls "taking charge" is, in many ways, a defense mechanism. Her meticulous planning and constant forward motion aren’t signs of confidence — they’re signs of fear.


This is where the film offers something unexpectedly insightful: Anna isn’t just trying to move her relationship forward — she’s trying to outrun emotional vulnerability.


In mental health terms, this is what we often call over-functioning. It’s a common dynamic, particularly among high-achieving adults, where someone manages, fixes, and plans not because they’re emotionally grounded — but because they’re emotionally guarded. The very behaviors that make someone seem “put together” are often the same ones keeping them disconnected from themselves and others.


Anna’s decision to propose — while framed as empowering — is actually a form of emotional self-protection. By scripting the relationship and forcing a next step, she avoids the uncertainty of asking deeper questions like: Am I truly happy? Do I feel emotionally safe with this person? What do I want outside of this plan?



Emotional Avoidance: When Busy Means Numb


Anna’s coping style is rooted in what therapists call emotional avoidance — using action, logic, or external control to escape from uncomfortable feelings. This shows up when someone keeps busy instead of feeling grief, intellectualizes instead of expressing sadness, or fixes everyone else’s problems instead of facing their own pain.


It’s a survival strategy, often learned early in life, especially by those who grew up in emotionally unpredictable or high-pressure environments. Over time, staying “busy” becomes synonymous with staying safe.


But the problem is this: you can’t selectively numb. When we push away fear, grief, or uncertainty, we often push away joy, intimacy, and connection, too. That’s exactly what Anna experiences. Her life looks beautiful on the outside, but she’s emotionally flatlined — disconnected from her own wants, instincts, and emotional truth.


Leap Year cleverly uses physical detours and delays to mirror Anna’s internal journey: her plans fall apart so that she can fall inward.


Declan: The Mirror She Didn’t Know She Needed


Enter Declan — the emotionally scruffy Irish innkeeper who seems to live by intuition, mess, and quiet honesty. At first glance, he’s Anna’s complete opposite. But as they’re forced to spend time together navigating the Irish countryside, something deeper unfolds.


Declan doesn’t just help Anna get from point A to point B. He challenges her emotional blueprint. He points out her discomfort with uncertainty, her performative confidence, and her inability to sit with discomfort — not in a cruel way, but with a kind of grounded insight that only someone who’s done their own healing can offer.


He doesn’t ask her to change. He simply invites her to be more herself.


And that’s the turning point: when Anna starts letting go of how things “should” look and begins noticing how she actually feels — uncomfortable, unsure, but also alive and curious. Through Declan, she begins to experience what it feels like to be emotionally present, even in messiness. It’s in this space — not the perfect proposal — where intimacy actually grows.


From Survival Mode to Emotional Freedom


By the end of Leap Year, Anna’s biggest leap isn’t the journey across Ireland or the question she originally came to ask. It’s the shift from performing her life to living it honestly.


This is what healing often looks like: not dramatic transformations or Hollywood moments, but subtle changes in how we relate to ourselves. It’s the courage to say, “I don’t know,” to slow down long enough to feel your feelings, and to admit that what you’ve been doing — even if it looks good on paper — isn’t emotionally sustainable.


For high-functioning adults, this can be one of the hardest truths to accept: that outward success doesn’t mean inner peace. That doing everything “right” doesn’t mean you’re doing what’s real.


Leap Year ends not with a perfectly planned future, but with a moment of emotional clarity — a choice to be present, vulnerable, and connected.


The Takeaway: Control May Feel Safe, But Connection Heals


Romantic comedies don’t always aim to offer therapeutic insight, but Leap Year does something quietly profound. It shows that sometimes we hide behind plans and perfection not because we’re confident — but because we’re afraid of being seen.


And sometimes, healing begins when we allow ourselves to be seen anyway.


Eye-Opening Final Question:


What parts of your life are you micromanaging to avoid what you’re really feeling — and what might change if you let yourself feel instead of just function?


More Related Articles:

  • Writer: Julie Barris | Crisis Counselor | Therapist-in-Training
    Julie Barris | Crisis Counselor | Therapist-in-Training
  • May 25
I Know What You Did Last Summer: When the Real Horror Is Trauma Left Untold

At a glance, I Know What You Did Last Summer (1997) is a classic horror flick: a group of teens, a deadly secret, and a relentless killer with a hook. But behind the gore and suspense is a quieter, more haunting story—one about adolescent trauma, unprocessed grief, and the unraveling that happens when young people carry the unbearable alone.


Let’s take a closer look—through the lens of the 12 Core Concepts for Understanding Traumatic Stress Responses in Children and Adolescents, developed by the National Child Traumatic Stress Network (NCTSN). These principles help us understand how deeply trauma affects not only what kids remember—but who they become.


1. Traumatic experiences are inherently subjective.


To an outsider, the teens’ decision to hide the hit-and-run might seem rash, even melodramatic. But trauma isn’t about what “should” hurt—it’s about what does. For Julie, Helen, Barry, and Ray, the event fractured their sense of self and safety. Each teen internalized it differently—some with guilt, some with numbness, others with aggression.


2. Trauma affects the developing brain.


Adolescence is already a time of major neurological and emotional development. Add trauma, and those pathways shift. The characters exhibit signs of hyperarousal (Barry’s rage), emotional withdrawal (Julie’s depression), and fragmented identity (Helen’s decline from pageant queen to invisible daughter). Their behavior reflects the brain’s struggle to adapt to overwhelming stress.


3. Trauma impacts multiple domains of functioning.


Their trauma doesn’t just haunt them emotionally—it affects their school performance, relationships, self-esteem, and decision-making. Julie can’t concentrate. Helen’s dreams collapse. Barry loses control. Ray avoids intimacy. These aren’t personality flaws—they're survival responses.


4. Trauma occurs within a broad ecological context.


The teens don’t exist in a vacuum. Their trauma is compounded by lack of adult support, community silence, and pressure to appear “fine.” No one is truly checking in. No one is holding space. This mirrors the reality for many teens whose pain goes unnoticed in school, home, or peer spaces.



5. Trauma and grief are often intertwined.


The hit-and-run wasn’t just about guilt. It was also about grief—grief for the version of themselves that existed before that night. And when the killings begin, the grief compounds. But without safe space to process it, their mourning is masked by fear, isolation, and panic.


6. Trauma can impact caregiver and peer relationships.


Each teen becomes emotionally disconnected from their families and each other. Where once there was closeness, now there’s mistrust. This mirrors how trauma often disrupts relational safety—especially when the people we need most become the ones we fear or push away.


7. Protective and promotive factors can reduce the impact of trauma.


Unfortunately, the characters in the film have very few protective supports. No trusted adults. No mental health intervention. No emotional scaffolding. In real life, this is what often makes trauma feel inescapable. Kids who have someone safe—a therapist, a teacher, a stable caregiver—are more likely to heal and integrate their experiences.


8. Trauma responses are often attempts at self-protection.


Barry’s aggression, Julie’s numbness, Helen’s detachment—these aren’t dysfunctions. They’re survival strategies. Whether through control, avoidance, or perfectionism, each teen is trying to make sense of a world that no longer feels safe.


9. Culture shapes trauma response and recovery.


In their small coastal town, appearances matter. Reputation, tradition, and silence rule. This social context discourages confession and vulnerability, pushing the teens deeper into secrecy. In many real communities, similar norms prevent young people from reaching out.


10. Trauma exposure can fundamentally alter identity.


Trauma doesn’t just hurt—it changes how teens see themselves. Helen no longer feels beautiful or special. Julie believes she’s “not who she was.” They’ve lost not just their innocence—but their self-concept. This identity shift is one of trauma’s most insidious impacts.


11. Developmental regression is common.


We see this most in the group dynamic: their reliance on impulsive decisions, black-and-white thinking, and power struggles suggests a kind of regression. Trauma can make teens feel much younger—emotionally frozen at the time of the event.


12. Trauma recovery is possible.


Though the film doesn’t offer much in the way of resolution, real life can. With support, safety, and the chance to speak the unspeakable, young people can move through trauma—not by forgetting, but by transforming it.


Final Thought:


If secrets can haunt us like ghosts, how many teens are living inside their own horror stories—waiting to be believed, heard, and held?


More Related Articles:

How RuPaul’s Drag Race Heals Racial Divides, Elevates LGBTQIA+ Voices, and Inspires Us to Thrive

In a world that often teaches us to separate, RuPaul’s Drag Race dares to unite. From the glittering runway to the emotional werkroom confessions, this show is more than a competition—it's a cultural classroom, where race, gender identity, and mental health intersect to teach us something revolutionary: everyone deserves to be seen, heard, and celebrated.


Race and Reality: More Than Just Makeup


Race isn’t a side topic on RuPaul’s Drag Race—it’s center stage. With queens of all backgrounds competing, the show doesn't shy away from the real conversations: colorism, racial bias, and the deep emotional scars that racism leaves behind—even within the LGBTQIA+ community.


Black queens have often carried the cultural weight of drag, bringing depth, humor, history, and heart. But they also bring stories of exclusion and struggle—both outside and within queer spaces. Drag Race lets these voices speak boldly, finally receiving the validation and recognition they've been denied for too long.


White queens, too, are challenged—not shamed—to grow. When they listen, when they support, when they choose empathy over ego, the show becomes a powerful example of what true interracial allyship looks like. Not performative. Not passive. But intentional and accountable.


It's here, in this messy, colorful, and honest space, that we begin to see what's possible: healing between Black and White—not through silence, but through shared experience, visibility, and growth.


Educating Beyond the Binary: Drag as a Living Curriculum


RuPaul’s Drag Race goes beyond entertainment—it's education in eyeliner. Every season, every queen, every strut down the runway becomes a lesson in breaking binaries and dismantling harmful norms. The binary—man vs. woman, straight vs. gay, Black vs. white—has long been the default lens of the world. But the show dares to ask, What if we stop choosing sides and start choosing truth?


Viewers meet nonbinary, trans, gender-fluid, and agender individuals—not as caricatures, but as real people with stories, pain, joy, and dreams. And for many watching at home—especially those from rigid, conservative, or racially divided backgrounds—these are the first LGBTQIA+ people they’ve ever truly seen.



In those moments, drag becomes a bridge. Not a costume. Not a performance. But a radical, joyful act of rebellion and education.


And it's not just about gender identity—it’s about breaking all binaries. Between toughness and tenderness. Between masculine and feminine. Between being celebrated and being silenced.


Drag says: You can be both. You can be neither. You can be you.


This opens a door for deeper empathy—not only for queer and trans people, but for all those who’ve ever been put into a box they didn’t choose. It invites Black and white audiences alike to examine how rigid gender and racial norms have hurt everyone, and how breaking free benefits us all.


Survival Isn’t Enough—Thrive, Baby


For many queer people—especially queer people of color—survival has been the standard. Make it through the day. Dodge the stares. Endure the microaggressions. Hide the pain. Show up anyway.


RuPaul’s Drag Race flips that narrative. On its glitter-drenched stage, queens who once felt invisible now own the spotlight. They don’t just survive—they thrive out loud. They bring their trauma and their talent. Their scars and their sequins.


From candid confessions about homelessness, addiction, and rejection, to stories of triumph, resilience, and self-made success, the show proves that thriving isn’t a fantasy—it’s a birthright.


It tells viewers:

💫 You are more than your trauma.

💫 You are worthy of love, joy, success, and rest.

💫 You don’t have to “man up” or “tone down” to make it.

💫 You deserve a life that honors your full self—Black, white, queer, trans, neurodivergent, disabled, everything.


And for those who don’t share those identities? The show offers a wake-up call: if these queens can thrive in the face of systemic oppression, you can do better than tolerate—you can uplift, protect, and celebrate them.


Because when one of us thrives, we all rise.


A Mirrorball for the World


RuPaul’s Drag Race is often called a mirror for the culture—but maybe it’s more than that. Maybe it’s a mirrorball: a shattered thing that still reflects light.


It reflects what’s possible when Black and White people meet with honesty, when queer identities are fully embraced, and when mental health is treated with compassion, not shame.



It doesn’t promise perfection. But it offers progress.


So here’s the question: If drag queens from every race, background, and identity can come together to love, learn, and lift each other—what’s stopping the rest of us from doing the same?


More Related Articles:


bottom of page